- All
- Product Name
- Product Keyword
- Product Model
- Product Summary
- Product Description
- Multi Field Search
Specialized in PE, PVC, TPE, TPU and Low Smoke Zero Halogen (LSZH) wire and cable compound and materials.
In high-rise buildings, subway tunnels, new energy power stations and industrial complex scenarios, the fire safety of wires and cables is directly related to life and property and system reliability.
YINSU Flame Retardant Company provides customized flame retardant solutions for global customers, covering PE (polyethylene), PVC (polyvinyl chloride), TPE (thermoplastic elastomer), TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) and LSZH (low smoke and halogen free) wire and cable systems to meet all safety requirements, ranging from UL94 V-0 flame retardant certification to EN 45545 fire protection for rail transportation and IEC 60754 low smoke and halogen free toxicity. All-round safety requirements.
Material Common Use Typical FR Type YINSU Flame Retardant Item No.
PE HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE, Red phosphorus, halogen free FR, PRP-950X, PE-XT-20, B-HFFR, MCA-B, WADP-10
Cross-linked PE cables, Bromine antimony masterbatch FR-ML-01, K100
Plastic insulated cables.
PVC PVC &Plastic insulated power cables, ATO alternatives T3, T30, FRP-950X, K100, ZHS, ZS, ZSB-A
Aluminum stranded wires, Zinc stannate
Prefabricated branch cables.
TPE Insulated wires, flexible cables Organic phosphorus MCA-B, WADP-10, FRP-950X, 95-MC
Shielded insulated cables
TPU Special purpose cables Organic phosphorus MCA-B, WADP-10, FRP-950X, 95-MC
Power cables for frequency converters.
Others Welcome to consult more details.
The challenges of flame retardancy for PA6/PA66 are entirely different from those of PP; melt drips, high processing temperatures, color restrictions due to red phosphorus, and moisture absorption and precipitation constitute the four major technical barriers. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the logic behind selecting flame retardants for PA and offers practical formulation data for FRP-750A, FRP-301Y3, and ADP to help engineers quickly avoid the pitfall of simply “applying PP formulations.”
Why Must Halogen-Free PP Flame Retardants Be Added at a Concentration of 25% or Higher? This article provides an in-depth analysis of the differences in the mechanisms of action between bromine-antimony (gas-phase chemical blocking) and phosphorus-nitrogen (physical carbonization), and offers a comprehensive solution to overcome physical property and cost bottlenecks through high-concentration masterbatches (PQ-75M), elimination of APP water-induced slippage, and blending technology. It also includes a cost-saving alternative guide for PPV2-8H/PPV2-6.
Why Do Attempts to Adapt Flame-Retardant ABS Formulations to PP Always Fail? This article provides an in-depth analysis of the differences in carbonization mechanisms between PP and PC/ABS from the perspective of molecular structure, uncovering the three major weaknesses of PP: “low oxygen index, difficulty in carbonization, and tendency to drip.” Based on actual test data from Yinsu’s PQ-75M, PPV2-8H, and PPV2-6, it offers a precise selection matrix to meet requirements for halogen-free export, cost-reduction V-2 ratings, and water-resistant, low-drip performance.
Uncover how YINSU Flame Retardant has made a technological leap in the field of PP flame retardant, 2%~5% can reach V2 grade, also known as dripping V0.
