Specialized in PE, PVC, TPE, TPU and Low Smoke Zero Halogen (LSZH) wire and cable compound and materials.
In high-rise buildings, subway tunnels, new energy power stations and industrial complex scenarios, the fire safety of wires and cables is directly related to life and property and system reliability.
YINSU Flame Retardant Company provides customized flame retardant solutions for global customers, covering PE (polyethylene), PVC (polyvinyl chloride), TPE (thermoplastic elastomer), TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) and LSZH (low smoke and halogen free) wire and cable systems to meet all safety requirements, ranging from UL94 V-0 flame retardant certification to EN 45545 fire protection for rail transportation and IEC 60754 low smoke and halogen free toxicity. All-round safety requirements.
Material Common Use Typical FR Type YINSU Flame Retardant Item No.
PE HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE, Red phosphorus, halogen free FR, PRP-950X, PE-XT-20, YS-F22B, MCA-B
Cross-linked PE cables, Bromine antimony masterbatch MDH, ATH
Plastic insulated cables.
PVC PVC &Plastic insulated power cables, T3 / ATO alternatives T3, T30
Aluminum stranded wires,
Prefabricated branch cables.
TPE Insulated wires, flexible cables Organic phosphorus YS-F22B, YS-9003
Shielded insulated cables
TPU Special purpose cables Organic phosphorus YS-F22B, YS-9003
Power cables for frequency converters.
Others Welcome to consult more details.
Inorganic flame retardants such as ATH and MDH require high loading levels in TPU to achieve the required flame retardancy rating; however, high loading levels severely degrade the material’s mechanical properties and flexibility. Through nano-blending strategies—such as the physical barrier effect of nano-clay layers and the carbonization mechanism of expandable graphite—it is possible to enhance flame retardancy while reducing the amount of inorganic additives, thereby providing an alternative to phosphorus-based flame retardants for TPU.
Phosphorus prices have risen by over 20% this year! The surge in new energy batteries has ignited the entire phosphorus-based flame retardant industry chain. With demand for lithium iron phosphate doubling, cost pass-through for phosphorus-based flame retardants is accelerating, leading to a revaluation of companies with integrated operations spanning phosphate ore, elemental phosphorus, and flame retardants.
Just because a formulation works in the lab doesn’t mean it can be stably mass-produced on the line. The real threshold in flame retardant preparation lies in the transition from craftsmanship to engineering—and modified coating technology is precisely the bridge across that gap.
From antimony oxide-chlorinated paraffin in 1930 to today's nanocomposites and macromolecular design, we systematically trace the evolution of flame retardant technologies, while providing an in-depth introduction to cutting-edge directions such as composite systems, synergistic mechanisms, and macromolecular flame retardants. For technical professionals focused on halogen-free, high-efficiency flame retardant solutions, this review offers valuable technical insights and trend analysis.
Want your adhesive layer to be non-combustible yet remain strongly adhesive? Choosing the right "flame retardant for adhesives" is key! Check out this article, which breaks down three major formulation strategies: phosphorus-nitrogen synergy, intumescent char layers, and ultrafine aluminum hydroxide. Learn how to achieve UL 94 V-0 with the minimum amount of "adhesive flame retardant" additive, maintain peel strength without compromise, keep curing speed unchanged, and easily accomplish the halogen-free flame-retardant upgrade for epoxy, polyurethane, and acrylic systems!
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the balance between flame retardant decomposition temperature and efficiency. It reveals how halogen-free flame retardants can achieve both low-smoke/low-toxicity and UL 94 V-0 performance during high-temperature processing, offering replicable practical parameters for material selection and process optimization.