Views: 32 Author: Yinsu FLame Retardant Publish Time: 2026-08-24 Origin: www.flameretardantys.com
Weekly Report on the Sulfur Industry (August 14–21, 2026)
I. Market Overview for This Week
The domestic sulfur market continued its downward trend this week. As of August 20, the prevailing price for granular sulfur at Zhenjiang Port stood at 8,750 yuan per metric ton, down 300 yuan per metric ton from last Thursday—a decline of 3.31%. Overall, the market was characterized by “a pullback from high levels and light trading”: sellers showed a stronger willingness to offload inventory, while buyers remained largely on the sidelines; in the tug-of-war between manufacturers and traders, sellers gradually lost their bargaining power. In the Yangtze River region, the reference price for mainstream granules at Zhenjiang Port stood at 8,750 yuan per metric ton, down 100 yuan per metric ton from the previous day. As more sellers grew concerned about market expectations, their willingness to sell increased, while buyers retreated to adopt a wait-and-see attitude. Continued sluggish trading activity drove prices further downward.
From a price-driven perspective, high inventory levels in external markets and rapidly declining auction prices have driven transaction prices lower in many regions. However, the global supply shortage remains a key factor supporting the market from the bottom. Nationwide port sulfur inventories stand at 878,400 metric tons. Although this represents a 5.25% increase from last week, it is down more than 63% year-over-year and remains at a near-decade low. The global supply gap is estimated at approximately 5.13 million metric tons, with imports far below normal levels. The four-tier transmission framework (global supply and demand → Chinese imports → port inventories → spot prices) currently points to “tight supply, low inventories, and high prices.” The scope for price declines is expected to be limited.
Regional price trends showed significant divergence:
Shandong Market: Liquid sulfur prices fell by 123–372 yuan per metric ton, with mainstream quotes ranging from 8,530 to 8,673 yuan per metric ton. At the beginning of the week, auction prices declined due to price cuts in external markets; however, as concentrated restocking demand from downstream buyers materialized, market sentiment shifted from weak to strong, resulting in significant auction premiums and a rebound in prices. Auction prices at independent refiners briefly dropped to 8,255–8,395 yuan/metric ton before rebounding to 8,405–8,445 yuan/metric ton. As the weekend approached, refinery shipments contracted significantly, tightening regional supply. This pattern of declining supply and rising demand supported a strengthening in prices.
East China Market: Liquid sulfur prices were reduced by 200–320 yuan/metric ton, with mainstream quotes ranging from 8,550 to 8,950 yuan/metric ton. As a major refinery in Jiangsu nears the end of its maintenance period, market procurement sentiment has turned cautious.
Northeast Market: Solid sulfur prices were reduced by 550 yuan/metric ton to 8,750 yuan/metric ton; liquid sulfur prices fell by 370–401 yuan/metric ton, with mainstream quotes ranging from 8,736 to 8,760 yuan/metric ton. High inventory levels in the neighboring Shandong market, coupled with a rapid decline in non-auction prices last week, drove down the winning bid prices at Northeast factories’ auctions on Monday. However, after price cuts in the neighboring market, the downward trend gradually stabilized, and there were virtually no unsold lots in the Northeast market this week.
Northwest Market: Solid sulfur prices fell by 80–340 yuan/metric ton, with quotes ranging from 8,260 to 8,850 yuan/metric ton. Affected by the sharp drop in liquid sulfur prices, market sentiment was poor at the beginning of the week, and auction activity was subdued; even after low-priced inventory dropped to 8,260 yuan/metric ton, sales did not show any significant improvement.
II. Supply and Demand Fundamentals
Supply Side: This week, national sulfur production totaled 191,100 metric tons, down 5,000 metric tons from last week. Lijin Petrochemical suspended operations for maintenance, while production at Guangxi Petrochemical and Inner Mongolia Yitai declined. Domestic production capacity remained at 20.17 million metric tons per year. Overall supply remained largely unchanged, but a trend of structural tightening was evident. Imports of liquid sulfur totaled 32,400 metric tons, up 105.06% from the previous period; however, imports of solid sulfur amounted to only 15,000 metric tons, a 54.55% decrease from the previous week. Currently, the increase in domestic sulfur supply is very limited.
Demand Side: This week, national sulfur consumption reached 290,300 metric tons, an increase of 2,000 metric tons from last week, representing a 0.07% rise. Demand across various downstream industries showed mixed trends, with overall consumption fluctuating at a relatively strong level. The structure of downstream demand has diverged significantly: the weekly operating rate for caprolactam stood at 68.04%, down from the previous week; the capacity utilization rate for titanium dioxide was approximately 72.71%; and the phosphate fertilizer industry is gradually emerging from its seasonal slump, with expectations of a slight increase in operating rates. High sulfur prices are forcing downstream sectors to switch to alternative acid production methods, such as smelting-based acid and phosphogypsum-based acid, fundamentally altering the demand-side reliance on sulfur.
Supply and Demand Balance: This week, there remains a gap of approximately 100,000 metric tons between supply and consumption, which must be covered by port inventories. The global sulfur supply shortage persists, with tight supplies from the Middle East and Kazakhstan. The global supply shortfall is estimated at approximately 5.13 million metric tons, with imports far below normal levels. The combined effects of rising demand from the new energy sector and reduced petroleum refining capacity mean that even if leading phosphate fertilizer and phosphate chemical companies adopt the phosphogypsum acid production route to reduce sulfur demand, sulfur prices are unlikely to return to previous lows.
III. Inventories and Imports
Port Inventories: As of August 18, national port inventories stood at 882,500 metric tons, up 5.25 percentage points from last Thursday. Specifically, Fangchenggang Port held 400,000 metric tons, Zhanjiang Port 160,000 metric tons, Zhenjiang Port 197,000 metric tons, Dafeng Port 89,000 metric tons, Nanjing Port 5,000 metric tons, and Beihai Port 20,000 metric tons. Inventories at Yangtze River ports totaled 287,000 metric tons, an increase of 6,000 metric tons from last Thursday. Although inventories have rebounded slightly, they remain at a near-decade low. During the period from 2026, when inventories plummeted from 2 million metric tons to 750,000 metric tons, price volatility was greatly amplified. The weak inventory buffer makes it difficult to effectively cope with fluctuations in arrivals, and any marginal decrease in arrivals could trigger a sharp price reaction.
Import Arrivals: This week, the recorded volume of solid sulfur arrivals was 15,000 metric tons, a decrease of 54.55% from the previous period; liquid sulfur arrivals totaled 32,400 metric tons, an increase of 105.06% from the previous period. With limited incoming supplies, port inventories remain at low levels. At the end of July, sulfur inventories at ports nationwide briefly fell below 800,000 metric tons. Sinochem Fertilizer’s shipment of 60,900 metric tons of imported sulfur arrived at Dafeng Port in Jiangsu, marking the largest shipment of commercially traded sulfur to arrive in the domestic market this year. Import volumes remain well below normal levels.
IV. International Markets
As of August 21, the main international sulfur market prices were as follows:
Vancouver FOB: $1,050–1,200 per metric ton
Middle East FOB: $865–890 per metric ton
Iran FOB: $750–850 per metric ton
U.S. Gulf FOB: $1,150–1,200 per metric ton
Brazil CFR: $1,100–1,200 per metric ton
India CFR: $1,000–1,100 per metric ton
Indonesia CFR: $1,050–1,100 per metric ton
China CFR: $1,000–1,100 per metric ton
The copper and cobalt industries have become the key drivers shaping current international sulfur prices. Over the past month, the market has recorded cumulative transactions totaling 130,000 metric tons of sulfur, which is scheduled to arrive at various West African ports between August and early September. Unlike downstream sectors such as fertilizers, industrial chemicals, and nickel—where procurement costs remain under sustained pressure—buyers in the copper and uranium industries are willing to continue stockpiling at current high prices through the end of the year.
In July, large volumes of sulfur were imported through East African ports to supply copper belt mining regions; in August, the flow of cargo gradually shifted to West African ports. Shipping routes from North America offer freight rate advantages, and inland trucking rates to Central African mining regions have simultaneously declined. Freight rates for shipments to China on mainstream vessel types (30,000–35,000 metric tons) remain at $140–155 per metric ton, resulting in a theoretical CFR cost of $1,005–1,045 per metric ton.
A mix of bullish and bearish factors: Operating rates at sulfur plants in the fertilizer industry continue to decline, leading to shrinking sulfur demand; however, supply shortages in the Middle East and Kazakhstan mean that, even as downstream demand continues to contract, overall market supply remains tight. Although the copper industry supports sulfur prices, a single sector is insufficient to prop up the overall market. Despite significantly weaker downstream demand, global supply shortages will limit the scope for a sharp decline in sulfur prices.
V. Analysis of Downstream-Related Markets
Sulfuric Acid: This week, the domestic sulfuric acid market continued its weak trend, with pronounced regional divergence. Supply remained ample overall, while downstream demand stayed sluggish; industries such as phosphate fertilizers and chemicals largely limited purchases to meeting essential needs. Quotes in Hubei, Hunan, Anhui, and other regions were reduced by 100–135 yuan/metric ton; in Fujian, supported by relatively tight regional supply, prices rose three times during the week, with a cumulative increase of 60–90 yuan/metric ton. The ex-factory price for 98% smelting-grade sulfuric acid in Hubei was 1,550–1,650 yuan/metric ton; in Fujian, it was 1,860–2,010 yuan/metric ton. In mid-August, the average domestic sulfuric acid price stood at 1,738 yuan/metric ton, down 1.54% from the beginning of the month. With downstream end-users in the traditional off-season, the domestic sulfuric acid market remains sluggish in the short term, and the overall market is expected to continue trading on a weak note.
Phosphate Fertilizers: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) continued its weak performance, with supply-guaranteeing enterprises quoting at the guided price, while traders offered discounts to move inventory, causing the actual transaction price to shift downward. In the downstream compound fertilizer sector, shipments of finished products improved slightly in some areas, though the extent was limited, and buyers remained cautious. Diammonium phosphate (DAP) consolidated at weak levels, with the ex-factory price for 64% DAP in Hubei holding steady at 4,800–4,850 yuan per metric ton. While manufacturers were strongly committed to maintaining prices, the launch of the fall fertilizer season was slow, and end-user purchasing enthusiasm remained limited. Although sulfur prices have fallen by about 16% from their June peak to 8,941 yuan/metric ton, phosphate fertilizer prices have still risen by about 20% year-on-year to 3,785 yuan/metric ton due to rising costs. High sulfur prices in the second half of the year will continue to put cost pressure on the wet-process phosphate chemical and phosphate fertilizer industries.
Titanium Dioxide: The average price of sulfuric acid-process rutile-type titanium dioxide was 14,279 yuan per metric ton, a slight month-over-month decline of 1.14%. On the raw material side, titanium concentrate prices have been consolidating at weaker levels, while sulfuric acid prices have declined in some regions, weakening cost support. With no significant positive developments on the demand side and continued inventory pressure on manufacturers, the market is likely to remain weak in the short term. Currently, the mainstream ex-factory prices for sulfuric acid-process rutile-type titanium dioxide range from 12,800 to 15,200 yuan per metric ton, and for anatase-type titanium dioxide from 12,300 to 13,200 yuan per metric ton.
Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP): Prices rose initially but then fell; the weekly average price saw a narrow increase driven by lithium prices. Leading manufacturers are operating at full capacity at high production levels, and the energy storage sector forms the core of demand, maintaining underlying support. The new energy sector’s use of lithium iron phosphate contributes 900,000–1.4 million metric tons of new sulfur demand.
VI. Market Outlook for Next Week
Looking ahead to next week, the sulfur market is expected to remain weak. Tight supply conditions provide solid support for spot sulfur prices, but downstream buyers, with a generally bearish outlook, are adopting a wait-and-see attitude.
Prices: Next week, the price of mainstream granular sulfur at Zhenjiang Port is expected to hover around 8,500–8,600 yuan per metric ton, with room for further decline from previous highs. Active buying interest is scarce in the spot market, while sellers with uncertain sentiment are clearly eager to offload their inventory. Unless new positive news emerges, the market is likely to continue its downward trend.
Driving Factors:
International Market: Demand remains weak and transactions are limited, but global supply shortages are preventing prices from falling sharply.
Demand Side: Domestic downstream buyers are meeting only essential needs, and the overall market sentiment is lackluster. Phosphate fertilizer producers’ autumn stockpiling demand will gradually materialize, and the market’s supply-demand balance is expected to undergo a phased recovery.
Supply Side: Production expectations remain low, and it is unlikely that operating rates will increas
Inventory Side: Incoming shipments are limited, and port inventories are hovering at low levels; however, inventory levels determine the price’s sensitivity to marginal changes.
Market Sentiment: Sentiment is weak, and there is a clear willingness to sell.
Core Tension: A persistent tug-of-war exists between the fundamentals of tight supply (a global deficit of approximately 5.13 million metric tons and inventories at a near-decade low) and market sentiment driven by weak demand. Support for sulfur prices from the copper industry remains, but a single sector alone cannot reverse the overall downward trend. Key Factors to Monitor: Developments in the Middle East geopolitical situation, the pace of import arrivals, and the start of downstream phosphate fertilizer stockpiling for the fall.
VII. Analysis of the Impact of Sulfur Price Fluctuations on the Flame Retardant Market
As a key raw material in the phosphorus chemical industry chain, sulfur’s price trends have a significant ripple effect on the cost structure of downstream phosphorus-based flame retardants (such as red phosphorus, ammonium polyphosphate (APP), and organic phosphorus flame retardants).
Red Phosphorus Flame Retardants: Red phosphorus is produced directly from yellow phosphorus, and the production of yellow phosphorus is highly dependent on sulfur for acid production. Although sulfur prices have retreated somewhat from their previous highs, the price of 8,750 yuan per metric ton at Zhenjiang Port remains within the historical high range.
According to calculations, every 1,000-yuan-per-metric-ton increase in sulfur prices raises the production cost of yellow phosphorus by approximately 2,000–2,500 yuan per metric ton, which in turn drives up the quoted price of red phosphorus flame retardants. Current market prices for microcapsule-coated red phosphorus powder are approximately 34,000–36,000 yuan per metric ton, representing a significant cumulative increase since the beginning of the year. Against the backdrop of persistently tight sulfur supply and inventories at near-decade lows, prices for red phosphorus flame retardants are more likely to rise than fall in the short term.
Ammonium Polyphosphate (APP): APP is produced from phosphoric acid or phosphorus pentoxide, and rising sulfur prices directly drive up the production costs of both phosphoric acid and phosphorus pentoxide. Although sulfur prices have corrected slightly recently, the cumulative decline since June has been only about 16%, and absolute prices remain high. High sulfur prices in the second half of the year will continue to exert cost pressure on the phosphate chemical industry, continuously squeezing the profit margins of APP producers; some manufacturers have already suspended accepting low-price orders.
Organophosphorus Flame Retardants: The prices of intermediates such as trichlorooxyphosphine are significantly influenced by the cost of yellow phosphorus and sulfur. High sulfur prices are forcing downstream industries to switch to alternative acid production methods, such as smelting acid and phosphogypsum-based acid production; however, the substitution effect remains limited in the short term, and cost support for organophosphorus flame retardants remains strong.
Antimony Trioxide: Although there is no direct cost correlation between antimony and sulfur, it is worth noting that antimony prices have been rising steadily recently—No. 1 antimony ingots have risen from 90,000 yuan per metric ton at the end of July to 96,000–100,000 yuan per metric ton, while 99.8% antimony trioxide has simultaneously risen to 85,000–89,000 yuan per metric ton, representing a significant short-term increase. Bromine prices have also experienced a sharp increase recently. With the prices of the three major flame retardant raw materials—bromine, antimony, and phosphorus—rising in succession, the overall cost pressure on the flame retardant industry is climbing across the board. For downstream enterprises in the modified plastics, cable compounds, and thermal insulation materials sectors, the procurement costs of flame retardants face systemic upward risks; it is recommended that they assess formulation adjustments and supply chain stockpiling strategies in advance.